For this paper you must cite and reference 2 sources. The paper should be 2–3 pages and written using current APA format. Your paper should address the following:
a. How would you prepare for the following situation? (provide realistic examples and details for safety and survival)
(Scenario) At this moment, you are sitting at home working on your WCU class. Suddenly, the National Weather Bureau sends an alert across your cell phone—a tornado is headed your way. You have 15 minutes before touchdown in your neighborhood. What is your plan? This is a ‘shelter in place’ scenario, you cannot outrun the tornado. Identify a safe place in your home to take shelter.
You must include research. Cite and reference two sources and explain the recommended safety measures in a tornado emergency and how you would apply them to your specific living arrangements.
b. How prepared are you in the event of a disaster? Describe your level of disaster preparedness using specific examples and references to your “go-bag” and preparedness checklist assignments.
Example: “I am more prepared for a water-related disaster than a fire-related disaster even though I live in a highly secluded, forested area. I have a boat as transportation in the event of flooding, but I do not have rain barrels or fire barrier supplies on hand.”
Example: “There were many missing items on my preparedness checklist. I realized that I do not own a flashlight. If I had to use my phone as a light it would drain the battery very quickly.
c. Reflect on how prepared you were before this class and compare it with how prepared you are now.
- Have you acquired any new emergency items?
- Do you plan to take any additional trainings or certification courses?
- Have you shared your knowledge with friends and family?
Review the rubric for more information on how the assignment will be graded.
NURS 431 OL Family Disaster Plan Summative Assessment
NURS 431 OL Family Disaster Plan Summative Assessment
| Criteria |
Ratings |
Pts |
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScenario Response (Prompt a)
|
| 135 to >120.15 pts
Responds clearly, thoroughly, and eloquently to the assignment scenario. The response is reflective and insightful. The response includes detail that exhibits a firm understanding of the course content. All content is accurate and/or supported. Provides several specific examples: Identifies a safe place in home to shelter in place. Identifies realistic safety measures and survival strategies. Includes two sources cited and referenced to support safety and survival strategies.
|
120.15 to >101.25 pts
Responds thoroughly and effectively to the assignment scenario. The response includes some detail, but some ideas may be vague, incomplete, or lacking in insight. The response suggests an adequate understanding of the course content. Almost all content is accurate and/or supported. Provides a few specific examples: Identifies a safe place in home to shelter in place. Identifies a few realistic safety measures and survival strategies. Includes two sources cited and referenced, but they may not clearly support the safety and survival strategies presented.
|
101.25 to >79.65 pts
Does not respond adequately to the assignment scenario. The response is vague and lacking in detail. The response suggests a vague understanding of the course content. Much of the content is inaccurate and/or unsupported. Provides one example: Identifies a safe place in home to shelter in place or identifies realistic safety measures and survival strategies. Includes one source to support safety and survival strategies.
|
79.65 to >0 pts
Does not respond to the assignment scenario, or is off-topic. No sources are cited or referenced.
|
|
135 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLevel of Disaster Preparedness and Reflection (Prompts b and c)
|
| 135 to >120.15 pts
Evaluates one’s level of preparedness by thoroughly and thoughtfully reflecting on the Assignment Checklist items and categories. Draws conclusions and makes reasonable predictions. Provides specific examples from one’s personal situation to support the evaluation with evidence. Reflects thoughtfully and in-depth on personal growth in disaster preparedness throughout the course, offering examples and details for evidence.
|
120.15 to >101.25 pts
Evaluates one’s level of preparedness by thoughtfully reflecting on the Assignment Checklist items and categories. Draws conclusions. Provides general examples to support the evaluation. Reflects on personal growth in disaster preparedness throughout the course.
|
101.25 to >79.65 pts
Evaluates one’s level of preparedness, but does not refer to the Assignment Checklist items and categories. Does not draw conclusions. Provides general examples, but they are inadequate in supporting the evaluation. Does not reflect on personal growth in disaster preparedness throughout the course, or is vague in reflection.
|
79.65 to >0 pts
Does not respond to the assignment, or is off-topic.
|
|
135 pts
|
|
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeMechanics and APA
|
| 30 to >26.7 pts
The assignment consistently follows current APA format and is free of errors in formatting, citation, and references. There are no grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. All sources are correctly cited and referenced.
|
26.7 to >22.5 pts
The assignment consistently follows current APA format with only isolated and inconsistent mistakes and/or has a few grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Most sources are correctly cited and referenced.
|
22.5 to >17.7 pts
The assignment does not consistently follow current APA format. There are several APA mistakes and/or several grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. A few sources are correctly cited and referenced.
|
17.7 to >0 pts
The assignment does not follow current APA format. Most sources are incorrectly cited and referenced, or are missing.
|
|
30 pts
|
|
Total Points: 300
|
