Health Promotion /disease presentation

Criteria – presentation

Excellent

Developing

Not Satisfactory

Criterion 1: Succinct description of the health alteration.

Summarizes essential information clearly. Well structured, logical.

(3 points)

Essential information is not complete. Too much or too little information. Organization in sporadic

(1.5 points)

Inaccurate. Lacks structure or flow. Difficult to follow. Too much or too little information

(0 points)

2. Primary prevention.

Examines risk factors and genomic factors that impact risk of developing the alteration. Identifies possible assumptions that could impact approach to supporting patient and family. (3 points)

Risk factors listed. Impact of possible assumptions limited

(1.5 points)

Possible assumptions not addressed

(0 points)

3.Secondary prevention

Lists secondary prevention measures

(2 points)

List not complete

(1 points)

Not addressed

(0 points)

4. Patient and family teaching

Explains rationale for lifestyle modifications and secondary prevention measures from a pathophysiologic perspective (so patient and family can understand ‘why’ change is important. Explanation is understandable and relevant for someone with a high school education, but no background in health care. (8 points)

Relevance and clarity to patient/family of explanation is limited. Pathophysiologic perspective included, but minimally relevant to the family.

(4 points)

Pathophysiologic perspective not integrated. Relevance and clarity for family is lacking.

(0 points)

5.Social determinants of health

Examines at least two social determinants of health to be considered when providing patient and family teaching. Explains how the nurse can adapt teaching to unique situation. Makes meaningful connections.

(6 points)

Social determinants of health addressed. Explanation of how nurse can adapt teaching is lacking.

(3 points)

Social determinants not included. Adaptations not included.

(0 points)

6. Evidence based

Organization is clear and coherent. Accesses and uses two professional evidence-based sources (other than required textbook). Formats, cites, and documents a reference list for resources used with minimal APA formatting errors. Presentation grounded in evidence.

(4 points)

Accesses, cites, and references fewer than two professional evidence-based sources (other than required textbook). Strength of evidence questionable.

Citations and references have more than three omissions/errors.

(2 points)

evidence is limited

(0 points)

7. Presentation and organization

Organization is clear, logical, and engaging.
Minimum of twelve slides. Font type, size, and color is easy to read.
Clip art and graphics used appropriately throughout presentation.

(4 points)

Less than 12 slides. Clarity is lacking.
Potential for reader engagement is limited. Graphics limited. Some slides challenging to read.
More than 6 writing mechanics errors.

(2 points)

Presentation difficult to follow.
More than 10 writing mechanics errors.

(0 points)