Kijiji Tutors

Generation kill: A conversation with Stanley McChystal

Generation kill: A conversation with Stanley McChystal

September 2019

Week 7 Case Study: Generation Kill: A Conversation With Stanley McChrystal

  • Due
    Oct 20 by
    11:59pm
  • Points
    100
  • Submitting
    a file upload

Introduction
According
to Biography.com, “Stanley A. McChrystal led the Joint Special
Operations Command in Iraq during the Persian Gulf Wars and was top
Commander of American forces in Afghanistan” (“Stanley McChrystal
Biography,” n.d.). In the following interview, he describes the
challenges of fighting terrorist/insurgent forces in Iraq and
Afghanistan.

Instructions
Address the following in a case study analysis:

  • According to McChrystal, how did the battle against terrorist
    organizations/insurgencies change after 9/11 and from what factors do
    they draw their strength?
  • What technological methods are used in Afghanistan and Iraq and how
    have they been used tactically (i.e., what goals are they used to
    achieve)?
  • Have they been successful?
  • What is the risk of using technological capabilities against terrorists?

Writing Requirements (APA format)

  • Length: 2-3 pages (not including title page or references page)
  • 1-inch margins
  • Double spaced
  • 12-point Times New Roman font
  • Title page
  • References page

Due Date: By 11:59 p.m. MT on Sunday

Reference

Stanley McChrystal Biography. (n.d.). Retrieved from https://www.biography.com/people/stanley-mcchrystal-578710 (Links to an external site.)

Rubric

Case Study Grading Rubric – 100 pts

Case Study Grading Rubric – 100 pts

Criteria

Ratings

Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Length

5.0
pts
Meets length requirement

0.0
pts
Does not meet length requirement

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Content

10.0
pts
Paper addresses all aspects of the assignment.

8.5
pts
Paper addresses most aspects of the assignment.

7.5
pts
Paper addresses some aspects of the assignment.

6.0
pts
Paper addresses few aspects of the assignment.

0.0
pts
No effort

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Analysis

25.0
pts
Throughout the whole work, content expresses original thoughts or interprets the subject matter in a different perspective.

22.0
pts
Throughout most of the work, content expresses original thoughts or interprets the subject matter in a different perspective.

19.0
pts
Throughout some of the work, content expresses original thoughts or interprets the subject matter in a different perspective.

15.0
pts
Throughout little of the work, content expresses original thoughts or interprets the subject matter in a different perspective.

0.0
pts
No effort

25.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Support

20.0
pts
Throughout
the whole work, claims are supported with detailed and persuasive
examples; accurate facts and circumstances are used for support.

17.0
pts
Throughout
most of the work, claims are supported with detailed and persuasive
examples; accurate facts and circumstances are used for support.

15.0
pts
Throughout
some of the work, claims are supported with detailed and persuasive
examples; accurate facts and circumstances are used for support.

12.0
pts
Throughout
little of the work, claims are supported with detailed and persuasive
examples; accurate facts and circumstances are used for support.

0.0
pts
No effort

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Grammar, Mechanics, and Style

20.0
pts
Throughout
the whole work, the text is free of major errors in grammar, spelling,
and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence variety.

17.0
pts
Throughout
most of the work, the text is free of major errors in grammar,
spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence
variety.

15.0
pts
Throughout
some of the work, the text is free of major errors in grammar,
spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence
variety.

12.0
pts
Throughout
little of the work, the text is free of major errors in grammar,
spelling, and punctuation; demonstrates strong word choice and sentence
variety.

0.0
pts
No effort

20.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
APA: Citation and Reference Formatting

10.0
pts
Throughout
the whole work, in-text references are formatted using APA style;
references page includes complete bibliographic information for sources
using APA style.

8.5
pts
Throughout
most of the work, in-text references are formatted using APA style;
references page includes complete bibliographic information for sources
using APA style.

7.5
pts
Throughout
some of the work, in-text references are formatted using APA style;
references page includes complete bibliographic information for sources
using APA style.

6.0
pts
Throughout
little of the work, in-text references are formatted using APA style;
references page includes complete bibliographic information for sources
using APA style.

0.0
pts
No effort

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
APA: Title Page & References Page

5.0
pts
Paper includes both title page and references page.

2.5
pts
Paper includes either a title page or references page.

0.0
pts
Paper does not include a title page or references page.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Primary Source Reference

5.0
pts
Paper includes reference to the primary source provided within the case study.

0.0
pts
Paper does not make reference to the primary source provided within the case study.

5.0 pts

Total Points:
100.0